Abraham Lincoln And Martin Luther King Jr. - 1931 Words

Throughout this summer semester we have attempted to uncover the truths as to whether or not America is truly a liberal nation or if it is a nation made up of a combination of different political ideas. Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr. both played key roles in the advancement of civil liberties in the United States, while peacefully and benevolently fighting to uphold the principles of liberty and equality for all citizens, regardless of race. On the other hand, Stephen Douglas and Malcolm X, believed in a more radical and aggressive approach to establishing liberty and equality, which in turn, made them both very popular, as well as, incredibly reviled. These four important figures in American history, and the political beliefs that defined each man’s legacy, have provided a better understanding of the concept of liberalism and how it applies to current American political thought and action regarding race, as well as the relationship and tensions it poses with a democratic government. The definition of liberalism, according to Webster’s Dictionary, is â€Å"a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, non-violent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.† A liberal democracy is a form of government in which the representative body operatesShow MoreRelatedAbraham Lincoln And Martin Luther King Jr. Essay942 Words   |  4 PagesJoseph Stalin, Abraham Lincoln, Adolf Hitler, and Martin Luther King Jr. are all remarkable examples of some of the most effective leaders our world has ever seen. Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr. are well-known for being noble, astounding men who unified people by using a moralistic approach. On the contrary, Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler are both notorious for using cr uel, depraved conduct while developing their fame and power. This situation is very comparable to main characters, JackRead MoreThe Legacy Of Abraham Lincoln924 Words   |  4 PagesAbraham Lincoln was the United States 16th President in 1861. The Emancipation Proclamation was issued by Lincoln, which freed slaves. According to the National Archives and Records Administration, â€Å"The proclamation declared, that all persons held as slaves within the rebellious states are, and henceforward shall be free† (Archives.gov). Despite the fact that the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all slaves, it paved the way for African-American to fight for freedom. It also changed the focusRead MoreI Have A Dream Allusion Essay700 Words   |  3 Pages Martin Luther King Jr. portrays the message in his speech â€Å"I Have a Dream† that the Constitution guarantees to everyone the rights of equality and freedom no matter their skin color. In the speeches â€Å"I Have a Dreamâ⠂¬  by Martin Luther King Jr. and â€Å"The Gettysburg Address† by Abraham Lincoln, the authors, both use allusions similar and different from each other to convey the message that everyone is guaranteed the rights of equality and freedom. A similarity in their use of allusions is that they bothRead MoreAnalysis Of Martin Luther King Jr s Letter From Birmingham Jail986 Words   |  4 Pagesinform us on what is and was happening during those times. Abraham Lincoln’s speech, The Perpetuation of our Political Institutions, and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s Letter from Birmingham Jail are two important pieces of history. In Lincoln’s speech he speaks about the dangers of slavery in the United States and warned everybody that people who disrespected American laws could destroy the United States. On the other hand, Martin Luther King Jr. defended the strategy of nonviolent resistance to racismRead MoreLincoln And Abraham Lincolns I Have A Dream Speech956 Words   |  4 Pages Once, a man named Martin Luther King Jr. asserted, â€Å"Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that.† Martin Luther King Jr. was an astute abolitionist who performed a vital speech called I Have a Dream. There is another well-known speech just like this one by Abraham Lincoln called The Gettysburg Address. After attentively analyzing, comparing, and contrasting these two fundamental speeches in history, the readers have developed a question:Read MoreCompare and Contrast Any Two Public Figure1717 Words   |  7 PagesAbraham Lincoln was the 16th president as Martin Luther King Jr was not any president. The races are also different. Mr Luther King Jr was black himself so he was the one being affected in his time. Abraham Lincoln just noticed how horrible it must feel to be used as a slave. Martin Luther King, Jr., was a civil rights leader, an author, a minister, and an orator. Born in Atlanta, Georgia, to a middle-class family, King spent most of his career advocating for civil rights and protesting AmericanRead MoreI Have A Dream Speech Summary1149 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"I have a dream† speech was written by American civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr. on August 28, 1963. It took place at the Washington D.C Civil Rights March, on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. It is one of the widely known speeches that was given to point out the ongoing racism problem in the United States of America. This speech brought greater attention to the Civil Rights Movement which had been going for years and it is known as one of the famous orations in the history of US. TheRead More##ssination Of Martin Luther King Jr. And Abraham Lincolns Second Inaugural Address914 Words   |  4 PagesKennedys Remarks on the Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Presiden t Abraham Lincolns Second Inaugural Address were both written to acknowledge how war and hatred has destroyed our nation. Robert F. Kennedy’s purpose was to clarify the lack of equality and to offer sympathy to those who have been affected by hate crimes. Kennedy adopts a humanistic and humble tone in order to inform his mostly black audience of Dr. King’s death. On the other hand, Abraham Lincoln’s purpose was to set the platformRead MoreEssay on The Kings Dream1588 Words   |  7 PagesThe Civil Rights Movement in the 1950’s through 1960’s had many leaders, such as Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, Malcom X and many more. But King was the only one who stood out of the pack. His purpose was to have equality for all races, not just African Americans. King had addressed a speech that he had written and spoke of it at the Lincoln memorial in Washington D.C on August 28, 1963. In King’s â€Å"I Have a Dream† he motivated and touched n ot only African Americans but white folks as well inRead MoreThe Gettysburg Address And I Have A Dream Speech Analysis759 Words   |  4 Pageswritten by Abraham Lincoln, and Martin Luther King’s â€Å"I Have a Dream† speech states the importance of freedom and equality. Martin Luther King message to his audience In order to communicate their message of freedom and equality, Martin Luther King and Abraham Lincoln used allusions in their speeches. One major similarity in their use of allusions is their reference to the Constitution of Declaration of Independence. Yet, a difference is that King alludes to the Bible while Abraham Lincoln refers to

Pile Traveled To A Pineapple Cultivation Cradle In The

Pile traveled to a pineapple cultivation cradle in the pineapple-growing region to the south of Ghana, specifically at Akwapim South District in Eastern Accra to test his idea’s viability (Whitfield, 2012). Pineapple growing was initiated in the early 1980s by the local smallholders of Pogrom Nsaba, that occupied the areas between Nsawam and Aburi district capitals. Most inhabitants engaged in pineapple farming in turn of the century. Smooth Cayenne, an orange-skinned pineapple that has light-yellow flesh and tangy sweet taste attributes, was grown either consuming it raw or processing. The upsurge in pineapple material for factories export demand acted as an incentive for large pineapple cultivators to intensify production. Akwapim Hills†¦show more content†¦Also, the site was convenient as it facilitated easy access to Accra’s International Airport. Although Blue Skies was happy about the Ghana business accomplishments, consumer tastes produced a detrimental effect to the company. MD2 was readily acceptable in Europe while Smooth Cayenne became no longer in demand. It was largely cultivated and sourced from Costa Rica farms, and many entrepreneurs preferred it to traditional varieties. Del Monte, a U.S. company, generated fresh produce that made its way to international markets (Whitfield, 2012). Evidently, ‘gold extra sweet’ variety became popular massively increasing Costa Rica’s fresh pineapple exports. Later, Pile thought of forming a more robust platform that Blue Skies’ operations would be anchored on amidst growing competition. Heavy reliance upon fable smallholder farmers for the pineapple supply plummeted the company’s resources. An expansion-ability opportunity was denied, farm’s profitability and sales plunged, as outputs greatly interfered with owing poor agricultural informat ion (Kleemann, 2011). Pile thought that for Blue Skies to register profitable margins, farmers had to be empowered on monitoring of their farms. For quality pineapple harvest to be realized, Blue Skies can educate the farmers on various efficient cultivation means. When farmers become agronomically supported, the output will meet European standards. Agrochemical use, regarding fertilizers

The sons veto free essay sample

The Son’s Veto The mother in this short story sacrifices everything for a son who doesn’t even care about her. ‘Women today would not behave like this.’ Do you agree with this statement? You should explain how you feel about the characters and their relationship with each other. Remember to refer closely to the text. Hardy opens the story with a very detailed description of a woman’s hair. He is commenting on fashion of the time, he says ‘One could understand such weaving and coiling being wrought to last intact for a year, or at least a calendar month; but that they should be demolished regularly at bedtime, after a single day of performance, seemed a reckless waste of successful fabrication.’ He goes on to explain that this woman didn’t have any maids, which tells us her position in the class system. Hardy pities this woman because she had done it all herself, ‘poor thing’. Her name was Sophie; she was born in the country village of Gaymead in a remote nook of North Wessex. It happened when she was just nineteen, the first event that got her, to her present situation. She was working as a maid in the village’s vicarage when the wife of the parson Mrs Twycott, died. At the same time, Sophie had a young man, Sam Hobson, a gardener in the village. Sam proposed to Sophie. So a few months later, Sophie asked to leave the vicarage. Mr Twycott asked her why and Sophie explained that Sam had asked to marry her. A few days later Sophie asked if she could stay on, because her and Sam had quarrelled. At this Mr Twycott realises how dependant he was on Sophie ‘She was the only one of his servant with which he came into immediate and continuous relation. What should he do if Sophie were gone?’ This rhetorical question reveals Mr Twycott’s deeper feelings. Mr Twycott became ill, and whilst he was ill Sophie brought his meals to him, when one day, she slipped on the stairs whilst taking a tray down. She  twisted her foot in the fall and the village surgeon was called. Mr Twycott became better, but Sophie was no longer able to walk. The Parson felt guilty for Sophie’s predicament and her suffering on his account. ‘You must never leave me again.’ He asks her to marry him, and she feels that she is unable to refuse someone who is so important, she doesn’t marry for love. This happens on both occasions, when Sam proposes her reasons for accepting are not love, but a home. Women in this period were unable to live independently of their family the only way to escape the home was to get married. She didn’t marry Sam, which shows how unstable the relationship was. Mr Twycott committed social suicide by marrying beneath himself, and also the age gap meant the couple became persona non-gratis ‘despite Sophie’s spotless character.’ Marriage totally changes her situation. Geographically, she moves to London because in Gaymead they were shunned because of the marriage, and also Mr Twycott tried to refine her, to make her a lady and educate her in the ways of the upper class. Although she still couldn’t get-to-grips with the uses of â€Å"was and were†. They made few acquaintances, and those few were not impressed because she couldn’t ‘talk proper’. This is Hardy’s attempt to sneer at the class system, with all the snobbery and hypocrisy. She gives birth to a son, Randolph. He is given the best of everything and a first class education. As he gets older and becomes inevitably like his friends, a snob, he grows away from his mother and starts to resent her failures ‘he loses his wide infantine sympathies’. At the concert in the park he corrects her speech and she accepts it without retaliation. She is subservient, because she was a maid and so would be used to obeying orders. She married the Parson because of this, also she didn’t have the power to retaliate against her son due to being a maid for years, and this fealing of incapability and dependency on her son would make her do anything to keep him coming home. ‘It is not you who are the child but he’. He grows up a snob, ‘a gentleman’ Hardy refers to the son as ‘a gentleman’ a few times, sarcastically. Its ironic because as hard as the  son tries to be upper-class he will never be, his mother isnt the reason, as he thinks, but its because of himself. The son is a spoilt brat. This is Hardy’s attitude towards the son. When Mr Twycott died, her situation changed. He had foreseen his death long before hers, and had planned for it. She was left with a house and enough money to live. She had no choice or control over anything ‘throughout these changes Sophie had been treated like the child she was in nature though not in years’. This is why Hardy took so much time at the start to describe her hair and how pointless it was, just as her life was. Also she had so much spare time that her hair was the only thing she could be proud of, and taking care of her appearance gave routine to her life which helped her to get through each day. As Randolph grew he became worse in his views and opinions. He was reducing their compass to a population of a few thousand wealthy and titled people. The mere veneer of a thousand million people or so others. Also after Mr Twycotts death she lost the few lady-like habits she had aquired. She had become-in her sons eyes- a mother whos mistakes and origin it was his painful lot as a gentleman to blush for. Again Hardy ironically refers to Randolph as a gentleman. In the next few linesHardy gives his opinion on the boy. As yet he was far from being man enough -if ever he would be- to rate these sins of hers at their true infinitesimal value. He goes on to say how Sophie is penned in and a mothers love for her son is the most powerful thing in the world, and he still may yet need it but as yet, it remained stored As time marches on her health deteriorates and she finds it difficult to sleep beacause she is taking no excersise. She doesnt live, she exists, eeks by, day-by-day, monotonous and without purpose. Everyday she sits in the window watching the farmers, going to market in the morning and returning in the afternoon. Fate is a continuing theme throughout this story, Hardy questions our existance, is choice merely an illusion, are we just puppets on a string reading from a script? Is everything pre-determined? If this is true then fate has a cruel sense of humor. One day whilst sitting in her window, Sam  Hobson, her childhood sweetheart finds her. He had heard she was living in that area of London and so had aquired a job taking produce to the market. This shows how much he feels for Sophie, he had gone through so much effort on such a slim chance of finding her. I knew you lived along here somewhere. I have often looked out for ee. She tells Sam how she misses Gaymead and the life they could have had tgether. After some time Sam proposes to her and she would love to but voices concerns about her son. Sam replies, very wisely in my opinion, with You can do what you like Sophie. It is not you who is the child but he. This epitimises the relationship Sophie has with Randolph. All her life she has been downtrodden and even her son pushes her around, she has always been told what she can and cant do. Sams reply is Hardy showing his dissaproval. When she talked to her son he was positive about the idea of re-marriage but when he found out that it wasnt to a noble gentleman but to a commoner, a farmer! He became angry and had a tantrum. After that Sophie was fearful of challenging her son and thought he would mellow with age. He didnt mellow, he continued to deny Sophie her sole desire. In a fit of rage he made Sophie swear on the cross that she would never marry Sam Hobson. Its difficult to believe how the son could be so cruel but also how Sophie could put up with him, in my opinion if he fell off a cliff it wouldnt be a bad thing. In the end she dies, alone, unhappy and senile. She spent her dying years talking to herself and sitting in her window. At the funeral her only mourner was her son, the clergyman. Who was supposed to represent God and christian valuesyet shows himself to be a snob and a hypocrite. Sam strove to better himself and became a well respected Green Grocer whereas Sophie sacrificed her health and hapiness all because she couldnt stand up to her son. I think Sophie was a weak, subservient person, but through no fault of her own, its due to having been a maid and servant all her life. She was a sad character who was a victim of the world in which she lived. Mr Twycott was a straight laced vicar who was always thouroughly organised. I feel he took advantage of Sophies kind and generous nature and that her situation is  partly his fault. Sam Hobson was Sophies childhood sweetheart, I dont think Sophie realised how much she loved Sam and she was foolish for marrying Mr Twycott. Sam is the hero of the story, he was dedicated to Sophie and showed this by following her to London, getting a job, and going through all that effort just to find her again. Personally I detest the son, he is a little swine whos   too-big-for-his-boots, he is a bully, he is snobby. Hes also a wannabe. He wants to be upper-class although he isnt upper-class at all. The way I feel shows Hardy has done a good job in making the reader feel antagonistic towards the son and sympathetic for Sophie. He makes me feel strongly about fictional characters. I enjoyed the story, my favourite character was Sam Hobson for being so noble, he was by far more of a gentleman than Randolph ever could be even though he was from a lower social class. This is Hardys aim, to highlight the stupidity of the nobility system. Even though he was from a lower class he was noble because of his actions and how he truly loved Sophie. In conclusion I think that women today would not act like this. Women are independant and dont need to rely on marriage to escape from their home. Society is no longer prejudiced as much, although some people still, sadly, are living in the dark ages and believe that a womans place is in the home. A womans place is wherever they want to be.